Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 February 19
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 19
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AerialviewofHingham.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:{{{Uploader}}}#File:AerialviewofHingham.jpg listed for deletion|{{{Uploader}}}]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:{{{Uploader}}}|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/{{{Uploader}}}|contribs]] | [[Special:Log/upload/{{{Uploader}}}|uploads]]).
- {{{Reason}}} Robmt1985 (talk) 00:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Joeailletstadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by AllisonFoley (notify | contribs | uploads).
- User: Mtownsend78 changed the source of the file alleging that the file had been taken without permission from [1], which is presumably the copyright holder. This user left a message on AllisonFoley's talk page stating the user's reason for believing the image belonged to that company. As far as I can tell, she has not rebutted the assertion. The message was left in August 2009. Ute in DC (talk) 07:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep, unless the source page can be found, we assume that this is self-created. I've searched through the website that Mtownsend78 provided, but I can't find this image. If the copyright holder wants this to be deleted, he can send an email to OTRS or provide a link to the source page. Nyttend (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, source page found. Nyttend (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wewillfuckyouup.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Drew R. Smith (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unencyclopedic. No value to the project. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Outright negative value, actually. Just a troll's leavings. Cheers, Jack Merridew 00:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't help the encyclopedia at all, but deletion will help. Nyttend (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pramiracetam.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mykhal (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, replaced by vector version Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ribavirin.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mykhal (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, replaced by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- orphan, sourced to random website, no indication of permission Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the Link and Use page on the website includes a statement of "(c) 2002 Kii Ali", so the license is invalid. Nyttend (talk) 23:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tapeterrible.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rama (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, sourced to random website (now dead) Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete: low resolution, non-crucial content, easy to reproduce if needed again, and the licence statement is dubious at best (of the uneducated good faith sort). Rama (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- orphan, sourced to random website, no indication of permission Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, it's not likely that Chung Yuan Christian University releases its images into the public domain. Nyttend (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete per author request (Note: the file now showing is the Commons one.) JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Reichenbach.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by JoJan (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, replaced by File:Heinrich Gustav Reichenbach 1823-1889.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It can be deleted, as it has been replaced by a better version. JoJan (talk) 16:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stack is a tshirtninja.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Stack (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, totally useless. Nyttend (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete, it serves no purpose, and it's an embarrassing picture Stack (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- However, I feel compelled to note that this picture was uploaded for use on User:Stack; of course, it's not being used there any longer, and I never plan to use it again. Nor do I expect to become noteworthy enough to justify this picture being included anywhere anytime soon. Stack (talk) 06:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sargon II.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dbachmann (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, sourced to random website (nowd dead) Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- it's a sketch of an Assyrian stele. Instead of deleting, it would be more helpful to figure out which stele exactly and where the drawing was published. --dab (𒁳) 15:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- well, tineye has nothing. We have a photo of a similar or identical stele already. Without the website, it is difficult to tell whether this was published before or after 1923. I'm not up for doing hours of research to try to track down where this was published, considering we already have a photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This looks to be an attempt to create a slavish copy without originality, so I don't see why copyright is an issue, but the photo of the actual stele is far superior, so this isn't a useful image. Nyttend (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Piranha.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mjoachim (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, low quality, species not identified Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, there are multiple much-superior images of piranhas already available, including one at Commons that's also named "Piranha.jpg". Nyttend (talk) 23:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rbarre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Adam_Faanes (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, no source given, unlikely that this is actually PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pigeon-in-flight-over-asphalt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Monedula (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, superseded by the better images currently at Rock Pigeon. Note that the image was used very soon after upload; it was added to Rock Pigeon in this edit. Nyttend (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Austintexasplanecrash.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by User name one (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Press photo being used under a claim of fair use. There are a gracious plenty photos on flickr of this building following the terrorist attack. Go there. Pick one out. Email the photographer and ask him/her to change his/her license to CC-BY-SA. We don't need press photos of public places. (Well, we should never be using press photos, but especially not for a photo of a public place.) B (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've uploaded a suitably licensed CC image, File:Surveying the damage.jpg, from flickr user jasleen_kaur. --Jatkins (talk - contribs) 13:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Orphaned and replaceable.--Rockfang (talk) 07:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the free image is actually better than the nonfree, so this could be deleted simply as useless even if it were free. Nyttend (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Portrait of Arsenio Martinez Campos.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Cramos05 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, dead source link, not obvious that this isn't a modern drawing Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shahadah.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mirv (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, we now have svg version File:Thuluth script from the flag of Saudi Arabia.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PilotMountainNC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Seth_Ilys (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low quality, we have a lot better images (see Pilot Mountain (North Carolina)) Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clearly inferior to File:PIlotMountainNC big pinnacle.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tartajk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Halibutt (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, no source (nl.wiki image has since been deleted), this is now represented using template in Savielly Tartakower Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the chess template is definitely superior. Nyttend (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rybnik flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Halibutt (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, replaced by File:POL Rybnik flag.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, superseded. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hammer sickle small.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Nikodemos (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, we have a variety of hammer and sickle images at commons:Category:Hammer and sickle Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, superseded by the Commons images. Nyttend (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sturmtiger 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Martin_Wisse (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphan, not clear which image in de.wiki this comes from, not clear why this is PD, we have a variety of images of this tank Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, inferior to File:Sturmtiger frontal.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sodium fluoroacetate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by FirstPrinciples (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, replaced by File:Sodium-fluoroacetate-2D-skeletal.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Remyhadleypromoseason6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hoav (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Replaceable by File:Olivia Wilde by David Shankbone.jpg. PhilKnight (talk) 18:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, we don't need a photo of the actress-as-character here. Nyttend (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Passingmeby.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by PDTantisocial (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Song content not discussed in article, not relevant. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:David Kitt - Say No More.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Balloholic (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Song article was redirected. No longer used. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:04 Lots of Lovin.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SoulBrotherNumberOne (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Yet another song sample that does nothing to increase reader's understanding. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this is like showing a picture of a Picasso painting on an article about the painting. When we're working with an audio subject, a sample of the audio increases understanding in a way that nothing else can. Nyttend (talk) 23:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not required to understand the article. Stifle (talk) 12:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CasperReel-sm-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Purplebananasandelephants (notify | contribs | uploads).
- I am the up-loader of this picture. It is no longer used because the article it was used for no longer exists. there is no purpose to keep it now, it is no longer use full Purplebananasandelephants (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.